Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes: > If the Secretary's creative interpretation is allowed to stand, the > proper description of what is happening can only be that this proposal > adds a new foundation document.
As you (and some others) are only arguing about the 3:1 supermajority requirement, why don't you wait and see what happens in the vote? If the option 3 doesn't win by a simple majority, there is no problem. If it does win by a simple majority but not by a supermajority, you can continue arguing the constitutional details. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
