This one time, at band camp, Helen Faulkner said: > Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > [...] > > > The Project Secretary is the author of the text that was used as a > > basis for the proposal in Choice 1. Of course as a sympathiser of a > > position somewhat opposite to my position it comes natural to him to > > try to oppose my proposal[2]. Nevertheless during the discussions in > > debian-vote he made some statements that make me think very seriously > > whether he is ruling conscientiously his office as Project Secretary > > and whether he is taking illegally advantage of his position. As an > > illustration, please read the following quotation: > > > > > >> Thankfully, Debian is not a democracy. We may vote on some > >> issues, but that does not mean we are a democratically run > >> organisation. The powers of various offices is spelled out in the > >> constitution. > >> > >> In this specific case, I am not going to let the spectre of > >> democracy spur me into doing something I consider wrong. In a true > >> democracy, I would either do what my constituency required even if > >> I thought it wrong, or resign. In Debian, I am permitted to do > >> what I think is right, in as unbiased a manner as I can, until I > >> am removed from my post. > > What is the source of this and your other quotation from the Debian Project > Secretary? I can't find the post on debian-vote.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailing-List: <debian-vote@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/10820 HTH, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
