Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes: > Nevertheless, no foundation document is actually being changed. > Therefore either this is a new foundation document, which requires a > change to the constitution, or it does not require a supermajority.
The clause being changed by choice number 3 is clause number 10. It would add a new license that the project definitely considers to be free. There, happy? :) > If choice 3 gets a majority but not by 3:1, whose view of the legalities > will prevail? The secretary's, as per 7.1.3. Feel free to propose a GR to override his decision. On a related topic, should the constitution define that overriding a decision by the secretary conserning 7.1.3 requires a 3:1 supermajority? Currently it is entirely possible for a simple majority of the developers to bypass the constitution. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
