On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:57:31PM -0500, Raul D. Miller wrote: > > I think it should, in fact. HOWEVER, there is no constitutional provision > > AT THIS TIME for it. Fact is, gecko has NO AUTHORITY to single-handedly > > alter the constitution in practice like this. > > Fact is? > > Fact is -- there was quite a dispute on debian-vote, about how to > interpret the constitition with respect to John's proposal. Guess whose > responsibility it is to adjudicate when something like that happens? > > Better yet, don't guess. Read the constitution, and find out. > > Then come back and respond to your post, with that in mind.
I would reasonably assume (obviously a mistake when dealing with bureacracies) that if the secretary needs to make a decision, they should interpret the constitution, not throw it out and do whatever the hell they want. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3 Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 <ultima> netgod: My calculator has more registers than the x86, and -thats- sad
