At 02:28 PM 9/27/00 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The problem is:
>
> (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
> legally (according to the constitution) be modified
> (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> should require a supermajority
> (c) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> by simple majority is perfectly reasonable and legal under the
> constitution
So, the real problem is:
* Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".
What about Article 7, Section 1, Clause 3?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
