On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 08:13:09PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > I remember when I suggested that we should follow clause 1 of the Social > Contract, this was pedantic for you too. Do you find adherance with official > documents always pedantic or only when you disagree with them?
Uhm.. well. Let's calm down. Matthew expressed his concerns (on IRC) that this insinuates he supports non-free in main. I'll make it clear: This is only a silly discussion on pedantry. I didn't mean to insinuate that Matthew supports non-free. There's actualy missing a lot of context and the reference shouldn't be interpreted that way. Sorry for the missunderstanding (well, my accusation of pedantry still stands but I hope the flame is finished here ;) -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
