On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:22:12 +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On mer, 2004-07-14 at 04:39 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > I wonder, did the proposer and the seconders read Constitution 2.1:1.
> > ("Nothing in this constitution imposes an obligation on anyone to do
> > work for the Project. A person who does not want to do a task which
> > has been delegated or assigned to them does not need to do it.
> > However, they must not actively work against these rules and decisions
> > properly made under them.")
>
> Actually, these are the words in the constitution that made me think a
> GR was the right thing for this case.
Care to explain that quite bizarre thinking?
To me, those words say that this GR proposal is a colossal waste of
time and harmful to the project.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Debian developer
http://kaijanaho.info/antti-juhani/blog/en/debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
