On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> While we're on the subject of interpretations, the first clause ("The
> Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom")
> constitutes a position statement about an issue of the day, under
> 4.1.5. Anybody who tries to give it a stronger meaning is invited to
> stop being a dick.That meaning is plenty strong as it is. "Position of the day statements can overrule foundation documents if they achieve a 3:1 majority" seems to be a valid interpetation of the constitution. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
