* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040528 19:25]: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > While we're on the subject of interpretations, the first clause ("The > > Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom") > > constitutes a position statement about an issue of the day, under > > 4.1.5. Anybody who tries to give it a stronger meaning is invited to > > stop being a dick. > > That meaning is plenty strong as it is. > > "Position of the day statements can overrule foundation documents if > they achieve a 3:1 majority" seems to be a valid interpetation of the > constitution.
"... if they achive a 3:1 majority and tell that they (might) overrule a foundation document". Reason: Please be specific what you want. As long as a GR doesn't say that it might touch a foundation document, it doesn't do. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]