On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:30:28PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > That would only apply if Andrew's proposal overrided the SC, which AFAICS > it doesn't.
That's an interesting point. The Social contract says that we have two priorities: our users and free software. Andrew's proposal says that we won't compromise on freedom. Either [a] "freedom" has nothing to do with free software, or [b] "freedom" refers to free software and this proposal is intended to mean that our users are less of a priority than software freedom, or [c] "freedom" refers to free software, but the proposal doesn't actually mean that anything has changed with respect to that priority. [d] something else (?) I'm not sure which is the case. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
