> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:16 AM > From: "Bret Busby" <b...@busby.net> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal > authentication. What alternatives to it exist? > > > It is unfortunate that you refused to read the Debian package > description to which you were referred. > Rather it's unfortunate that you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the so-called package's description. I may be at least three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound patronizing or condescending.
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... Stella Ashburne
- Name calling? [WAS: Re: The cu... Andrew M.A. Cater
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... tomas
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Greg Wooledge
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... debian-user
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't s... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasup... Charles Kroeger
- Re: The current package wpasup... Henning Follmann
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Pocket
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasup... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't s... Charles Curley
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't s... Stefan Monnier
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Jeffrey Walton
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WP... Kushal Kumaran