> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AM > From: "Pocket" <poc...@columbus.rr.com> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal > authentication. What alternatives to it exist? > > > > Are you comparing the same package/version arch to debian? The debian > one may not be the latest and the arch is almost always the latest. > I totally agree with you on this point. He quoted ArchLinux's version of wpasupplicant when I am using Debian's version. He's like comparing apples to oranges.
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... Stella Ashburne
- Name calling? [WAS: Re: The cu... Andrew M.A. Cater
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Greg Wooledge
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't s... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Pocket
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant d... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplic... Bret Busby
- Re: The current package wpasup... Stella Ashburne
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't s... Charles Curley
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't s... Stefan Monnier
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn... Jeffrey Walton
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WP... Kushal Kumaran