Le 07/06/17 à 13:48, Reco a écrit : > Hi. > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:53:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: >> Le 07/03/17 à 22:48, Dejan Jocic a écrit : >>> >>> You can still use Debian without systemd as init. Explained here: >>> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/05/msg00538.html >>> >>> If you would prefer that it is some derivate/fork of Debian without >>> systemd, I do not have personal experience with those, but I'm sure that >>> you will get few hints. >>> >> init is a small part of systemd. And judging y the bug reported and how >> they are treated, I do not trust any part of it. >> Neither resolved, logind, etc... > > So you do not trust udev as well? > > >> Too many critical bugs found in them and treated by the upstream >> developpers with only contempt for the people reporting them >> (see https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237#issuecomment-312458445) > > By that logic (in)famous libc bug 4980 shoud've stopped by from using > any sane Linux distribution 10 years ago. Did it? > Most important is not the presence of bugs. It is the way people in charge deal with them.
> >> This behaviour on a critical component is mere madness. > > OpenBSD folks beg to differ. > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=149902196520920&w=2 They were mocking systemd, not adopting the behaviour...