On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:11:03PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 22 sep 14, 21:17:28, Marty wrote: > > > > 1) The goal is "modular Debian." Multi-init is the means to achieve > > it. Being tied to one init system is what caused Debian’s problems, > > and the replacement did not fix it. A modular system has to support > > all init systems, including systemd, clones and custom inits. > > While you're at it how about also making sure we can have a dietlibc or > uClibc version of Debian? After all, depending on glibc is also not very > good. Oh, and don't forget about udev and X.Org. There is already work > in progress trying to compile Debian with something other than GCC, so > you don't need to worry about that. > > Yes this is a joke, but only in part. It's very interesting how suddenly > people are so worried about Debian being tied to one piece of software, > while this has been happening all along.
I just had a look and didn't realise how closely Debian is reliant on the C language! Surely, this can't be good! -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140923165444.GC22423@tal
