On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:12:52PM CEST, Marty <mar...@ix.netcom.com> said: > On 09/22/2014 05:39 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > > > > >Le 22.09.2014 01:51, John Hasler a écrit : > >>Martin Read writes: > >>>consolekit is indeed the thing that systemd-logind replaces (and > >>>systemd-logind was the reason the maintainers of consolekit stopped > >>>maintaining it). > >> > >>So who is going to step forward and start maintaining it? > > > >Nobody needs to. systemd-login does *not* depends on the init system. > >At no levels. So why should someone have to maintain an alternative? > >(well, there are probably tons of reasons, indeed, but systemd-login > >being a part of systemd is not a correct one since login part does not > >depends on init part.) > > So Debian won't do it, or maybe Red Hat. Not sure whose calling the shots > here. > > Nobody wants it, at least nobody who counts. It's not the business plan.
Only upstream refuses to have a systemd-* without the init system. So it makles it dependent of the init system. Bad lick (or bad upstream ?) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140922123406.ge16...@rail.eu.org
