Le 23/09/2014 20:46, Brian a écrit : > On Tue 23 Sep 2014 at 19:30:34 +0200, Erwan David wrote: > >> Compare it to to a init system which is the main reason to choose a >> desktop environment... >> >> See >> http://www.webupd8.org/2014/09/debian-switches-back-to-gnome-from-xfce.html >> >> >> So sytemd does in fact orient *everything*. You are not "integrated" >> into systemd, I am not sure debian will still be for you. >> >> That's the worse behaviuour of the worst commercial software vendor : >> wanting to lock usrers into what the vendor choose and denying them >> freedom to choose. > You do not like that systemd will be the default init system for Jessie. > Tough. Exercise your choice not to have it. Or is easier to moan rather > than just get on with using sysvinit? > > As for your link, you could at least have quoted a primary source, the > mail from Joey Hess making the announcement. That way people could judge > for themselves rather than relying on your inconsequential remarks. > >
That's just not the behaviour of _something meant to be a "default" with options. First, we see that other packages become dependant on it, making the "option" thing somewhat irrelevant. Next, other choices are done because of "integration" with systemd. Why ? why integration with a mere default choice among other choices woud be relevant ? Except if the agenda is *not* what was sold and agreed upon which was a mere *default*. Sorry, but this kind of things just make suspicious. What will next step be ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5421c56a.6090...@rail.eu.org
