On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:22:21 -0500, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you >>>>> can complain about tracker. >>>> >>>> More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as >>>> requirement "now". It was not just a few weeks ago. >>> >>> This requirement comes from upstream. >> >> (...) >> >> Any document to support that statement? >> >> It will be indeed very sad to see that requirement coming from GNOME >> ;-( > > What I said (including what you snipped) is just from memory.
The cutted text was not related to the subject of the thread so I removed it. > I don't care enough about this to google it... I was just trying to > explain from where it was coming. And from where it comes from? I know what tracker does and how it works, this is not the main issue but tracker as a hard requirement to have a full GNOME desktop. This is new. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jhe3o7$p4f$1...@dough.gmane.org
