On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:23:03 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 14.02.2012 18:13, Camaleón wrote: > >> I'm not speaking about "gnome-documents" but "gnome". I have "gnome" >> and I don't have installed many of the listed applications. >> >> What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like >> to know. > > Seriously, what is so hard to understand.
Nothing, it's easy peasy. Now "gnome-core" seems to be the right option for new GNOME installs because "gnome" metapackage is getting over bloated and is adding new packages on-the-fly. Sigh. > The gnome-related metapackages in Debian are modelled after what > upstream uses in their core [1] and apps [2] set of libraries and > applications. > > Simple as that. Not that simple. The metapackage requirements have changed and now users have to cope with that or install an application they don't wanted nor asked for. > That gnome-documents uses tracker is an implementation detail. Of course. I don't see any problem with gnome-documents itself. It's just that I didn't have installed that application and want to keep it so. > Michael > > [1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/core/3.2/ > [2] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/ Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jhe6vt$p4f$1...@dough.gmane.org
