also sprach nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.10.2049 +0100]: > i hear win2000 and XP improves on some issues, but > after 8 years of using MS stuff(DOS3.x -> NT4) i left > and never looked back. i gave them a fair chance, i don't > think they deserve another.
excuse me? did you *ever* productively (have to) employ either of the two? IMHO, NT4 is the last usable windoze, if windoze has to be used. XP is an absolute joke (micro$oft's long-term strategy seems to be to rule the world with a gameboy in every pocket, running XP), and 2000, well... while micky$oft surely had good intentions to improve upon and extend NT4, they really just screwed up. don't i faintly remember "everything will be centrally administrateable in the MMC", or "more secure"??? yeah right, redmond! -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "time flies like an arrow. fruit flies like a banana." -- groucho marx
pgpH1FFqyV9px.pgp
Description: PGP signature
