also sprach Stuart Krivis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.0121 +0100]: > I've never felt RPM was as good as DEB. RPM-based distros just don't seem > to be as maintainable over the long haul.
which i attribute to the FHS-accordance of Debian. really. > Personally, I have issues with a binary-based distribution. I am > enamored of the *BSD ports system and buildworld. :-) they have their advantages, but also disadvantages. installation takes way longer... and aside, what arguments do you have against binary-based distributions? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "security here. yes, ma'am. yes. groucho glasses. yes, we're on it. c'mon, guys. somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. code blue." -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
pgp6Qmc99moqu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
