martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Stuart Krivis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.0121 +0100]:
> > I've never felt RPM was as good as DEB. RPM-based distros just don't seem
> > to be as maintainable over the long haul.
>
> which i attribute to the FHS-accordance of Debian. really.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For the benefit of a lurking newbie, what is "FHS-accordance"?
>
>
> > Personally, I have issues with a binary-based distribution. I am
> > enamored of the *BSD ports system and buildworld. :-)
>
> they have their advantages, but also disadvantages. installation takes
> way longer... and aside, what arguments do you have against binary-based
> distributions?
>
> --
> martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
> \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "security here. yes, ma'am. yes. groucho glasses. yes, we're on it.
> c'mon, guys. somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
> can't deal with deconstructionist humor. code blue."
> -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
