On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:41:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 22/06/15 15:59, Antonio Terceiro wrote: [...] > > qdbm > > remctl > > rrdtool > > ruby-fcgi > > ruby-filesystem > > ruby-god > > ruby-narray > > ruby-odbc > > ruby-rmagick > > ruby-sdl > > ruby-taglib2 > > ruby-uconv > > stfl > > hyperestraier > > libguestfs > > mapserver > > ruby-hdfeos5 > > ruby-mpi > > ruby-netcdf > > ruby-passenger > > ruby-redcarpet > > thin > > Scheduled.
Thanks > > All others either FTBFS, or just use the default ruby (which should > > be fine), or don't use the supported versions reported by > > ruby-defaults/gem2deb. They will need to be looked at individually. > > > > I should be able to workaround a large part of the FTBFS by adding a > > dependency to gem2deb, and after that I will be able to file FTBFS bugs. > > > > Additionally, can you please adjust the ben file to remove false > > positives on arch:all packages? > > > > Affected: .architecture ~ /any/ & .depends ~ /libruby/ > > Why? Aren't the arch:all ones something that should be dealt with as well? Not > through binNMUs obviously, but the tracker lets you know when they have been > fixed or how many stuff is still using other ruby versions. > > Actually from a closer look I see that those two depend on libruby, but not on > libruby2.X. So they shouldn't be tracked because of that. I've fixed the > is_affected regex to look for /libruby2/, which fixed that. Your solution is indeed better because it would catch any arch:all packages that depend on specific versions (but shouldn't). Thanks again. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
