On 09/07/15 11:13, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> [150709 10:56]: >> On 08/07/15 14:11, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >>> I think after those we're left mostly with packages that only build >>> for the first ruby version they find, some broken "leaf-y" ruby >>> libs, plus ruby-yajl and ruby-redcloth which impact a larger chain. >> >> ruby-yajl and ruby-redcloth are marked as good in the tracker. What's the >> problem with them? > > Fellow team members have fixed them in the meantime, so they're no > longer a problem.
Ah OK. > Please also schedule a binNMU for this package: > > ruby-http-parser.rb_0.6.0-2 Done. >> I guess the next step is making ruby2.2 the default (probably in experimental >> first and making sure things still build properly, particularly those that >> only >> build for the default version). > > Yup; Antonio has uploaded a new ruby-defaults to experimental > Yesterday evening. OK good. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/559e3dae.1050...@debian.org
