On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:43:27AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 17/06/15 18:14, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Please binNMU the list of packages below in unstable. As changelog > > > entry, we can use > > > > > > Rebuild for ruby2.2 support > > > > > > The list: > > > > That happened, and only a couple of packages failed to build on one > > architecture: > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html > > > > Have you looked at those? Should we start the second round? > > I will give you a list for the second round ASAP.
qdbm remctl rrdtool ruby-fcgi ruby-filesystem ruby-god ruby-narray ruby-odbc ruby-rmagick ruby-sdl ruby-taglib2 ruby-uconv stfl hyperestraier libguestfs mapserver ruby-hdfeos5 ruby-mpi ruby-netcdf ruby-passenger ruby-redcarpet thin All others either FTBFS, or just use the default ruby (which should be fine), or don't use the supported versions reported by ruby-defaults/gem2deb. They will need to be looked at individually. I should be able to workaround a large part of the FTBFS by adding a dependency to gem2deb, and after that I will be able to file FTBFS bugs. Additionally, can you please adjust the ben file to remove false positives on arch:all packages? Affected: .architecture ~ /any/ & .depends ~ /libruby/ -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
