Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 17/06/15 20:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:59:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> On 2015-06-17 17:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo >>>> >>>> On 2015-06-17 16:08, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>>>> This transition will be used to track which packages need to be rebuilt >>>>> with Ruby 2.2 suport before we make it the default. Ruby 2.1 is still >>>>> supported, and only after 2.2 becomes the default we will start another >>>>> transition to phase 2.1 out. >>>> >>>> Please stage the transition in experimental first, and come back when >>>> it's >>>> clearer what needs to be done. >>> >>> We already know what needs to be done, since the transitions from 1.9 to >>> 2.0 and from 2.0 to 2.1 were done in a very similar way. We do the >>> transition in phases so that unstable is never broken: >> >> Right, I didn't appreciate from your mail that's it is to be a two-pronged >> transition or that ruby2.2 is already in waiting in testing. >> >> You'll tangle with the ongoing hiredis transition but we can sort that out >> later. >> >> Scheduled first round of binNMUs. > > Thanks. > > Looking at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html the > Bad: criteria will not get us the results we need. It has to be > > ! .depends ~ "libruby2.2" > > i.e. the packages that do *not* have Ruby 2.2 support, because at > this stage packages will not lose the libruby2.1 dependency yet. Ack. I have fixed that and simplified the tracker. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/558284e0.8020...@debian.org
