Hey Graham, Thanks for the update, it is very exciting to see the progress!
Can we get an exception/hint to ignore the s390x test failure for r-bioc-rhdf5 and the ppc64el test failure for r-bioc-tcgabiolinks? Thanks, On 09/09/2024 14.08, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Michael After the first migrations, a second wave of about 70 migrations happened after autopkgtests were retried. These can already be seen on the tracker. On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 09:44, Michael R. Crusoe <cru...@debian.org> wrote:We have a question about https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-tcgabiolinks ; the CI for this package has never passed on ppc64el, so we are confused as to why this is now holding up migration. Likewise for https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-rhdf5 ; the s390x CI has never passed here either.When autopkgtest infrastructure for new architectures are added, existing failures in testing are not considered regressions by britney. However, if a package is removed from testing, the failures are considered new, as with any other package attempting to migrate to testing for the first time. r-bioc-rhdf5 [1] was auto-removed from testing on 2024-06-25. r-bioc-tcgabiolinks [2] was manually removed from testing on 2023-07-14, a new upload was done on 2023-07-28 for the previous r-bioc transition, but was not able to migrate for more than a year. Regards Graham [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-rhdf5 [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
