Dear Graham,

Thank you very much!

We have a question about 
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-tcgabiolinks ; the CI for this 
package has never passed on ppc64el, so we are confused as to why this is now 
holding up migration.

Likewise for https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-rhdf5 ; the s390x 
CI has never passed here either.

https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks/testing/ppc64el/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-rhdf5/testing/s390x/

On 09/09/2024 10.33, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Michael

r-bioc-biocgenerics [1] has migrated and r-api-bioc-3.18 is gone from testing.
 From the release team's perspective, this transition is done.

There are still some packages that were not in testing for the
transition.  Please check the transition tracker [2] for "good"
packages marked "sid only",
Another place to check is the r-pkg-team DDPO page [3], and search for "Excuse".

I spotted a problem with r-bioc-golubesets [4], which still needs a
source-only upload.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-biocgenerics
[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-api-bioc-3.19.html
[3] 
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=r-pkg-team%40alioth-lists.debian.net
[4] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-golubesets

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to