Hi Michael After the first migrations, a second wave of about 70 migrations happened after autopkgtests were retried. These can already be seen on the tracker.
On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 09:44, Michael R. Crusoe <cru...@debian.org> wrote: > We have a question about > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-tcgabiolinks ; the CI for > this package has never passed on ppc64el, so we are confused as to why this > is now holding up migration. > > Likewise for https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-rhdf5 ; the > s390x CI has never passed here either. When autopkgtest infrastructure for new architectures are added, existing failures in testing are not considered regressions by britney. However, if a package is removed from testing, the failures are considered new, as with any other package attempting to migrate to testing for the first time. r-bioc-rhdf5 [1] was auto-removed from testing on 2024-06-25. r-bioc-tcgabiolinks [2] was manually removed from testing on 2023-07-14, a new upload was done on 2023-07-28 for the previous r-bioc transition, but was not able to migrate for more than a year. Regards Graham [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-rhdf5 [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks
