On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote: > AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source > are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are > either junk and pretty unstable or useless (at least IMHO). > So, I've never really seen any use in having ancient sources in > the *distribution* cds and I fear things will become worse with > woody (5 CDs binary installation ?).
You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series? What have you found to be the problems with them? I run them on a number of production machines at work and at home (mostly 2.2.19 now, but some older). -- Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2 Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
