debian-release  

Messages by Date

• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Domenico Andreoli
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Domenico Andreoli
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Domenico Andreoli
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/03/22 Re: Buildd info lag? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/22 Buildd info lag? Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/21 Re: More removal suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/21 Re: More removal suggestions Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/21 Hinting lm-sensors in Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/21 Re: More removal suggestions Riku Voipio
• 2004/03/21 Re: Removal suggestions due to uninstallability Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/20 Re: Removal suggestions due to uninstallability Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: tracking removals from testing Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/20 Re: Removal suggestions due to uninstallability Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/20 Removal suggestions due to uninstallability Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/20 Hint 'lam' Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Josip Rodin
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: Package removal proposals Josip Rodin
• 2004/03/20 Package removal proposals Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: Upgrade only supported from most recent point release Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/20 Upgrade only supported from most recent point release Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/20 Re: Bug#236554: Postgresql does not depend on libkrb5-17-heimdal but it is needed for upgrades Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/20 Re: Suggest removing gkrellongrun Colin Watson
• 2004/03/20 Re: removing libpng-dylan? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/20 Re: removal suggestions Colin Watson
• 2004/03/20 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/20 Bug#236554: Info received (was Bug#236554: Postgresql does not depend on libkrb5-17-heimdal but it is needed for upgrades) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2004/03/20 Processed: Re: Bug#236554: Postgresql does not depend on libkrb5-17-heimdal but it is needed for upgrades Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2004/03/20 Re: Bug#236554: Postgresql does not depend on libkrb5-17-heimdal but it is needed for upgrades Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/20 Re: Bug#236554: Postgresql does not depend on libkrb5-17-heimdal but it is needed for upgrades Martin Pitt
• 2004/03/20 Re: pysol should be removed from testing Matthias Klose
• 2004/03/20 Re: pysol should be removed from testing Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• 2004/03/20 Re: pysol should be removed from testing Martin Schulze
• 2004/03/19 Re: tracking removals from testing Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/19 pysol should be removed from testing Josh Triplett
• 2004/03/19 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/19 Re: removing libpng-dylan? Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/19 Re: removing libpng-dylan? Martin Michlmayr
• 2004/03/19 removing libpng-dylan? Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/03/19 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/19 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/19 Re: tracking removals from testing Thiemo Seufer
• 2004/03/18 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/18 removal suggestions Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/03/18 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Jeroen van Wolffelaar
• 2004/03/18 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Colin Watson
• 2004/03/18 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Martin Schulze
• 2004/03/18 Re: Getting rid of gnutls5? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/03/18 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Adrian Bunk
• 2004/03/18 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/18 Re: tracking removals from testing Jeroen van Wolffelaar
• 2004/03/17 tracking removals from testing Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/17 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/17 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Richard B. Kreckel
• 2004/03/17 Re: Re: Message WB Internet
• 2004/03/17 Re: Getting rid of gnutls5? Ivo Timmermans
• 2004/03/17 Getting rid of gnutls5? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/03/17 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/17 Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Andreas Barth
• 2004/03/17 Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs. Andreas Metzler
• 2004/03/16 Re: More removal suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/16 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/16 Re: Suggest removing irssi-plugin-icq from sarge Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/16 Suggest removing irssi-plugin-icq from sarge Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/15 remove wesnoth from testing (copyright issues) Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/15 Suggest removing gkrellongrun Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/15 ATTN Steve Langasek Jason Macer
• 2004/03/15 The NEW ISSUE STOCK I was telling you about, Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:06:27 -0800 Willa Burrell
• 2004/03/15 ...please Cookiemonster47
• 2004/03/14 Re: Remove svn-devscripts from sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/14 Norton AntiVirus hat einen Virus in einer von I hnen gesendeten Nachricht ermittelt. Die infizierte A nlage wurde gelöscht. NAV for Microsoft Exchange-MAIL5
• 2004/03/13 Re: Suggest removal of icecast2 from testing Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/13 Re: Cycle preventing removal Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/13 Re: More removal suggestions Igor Genibel
• 2004/03/13 Re: d-i second stage packages not in testing Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/13 Re: Cycle preventing removal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/12 Re: Cycle preventing removal Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/12 See your MS-Access or SQL-Server change in real time - $89 richard fencel
• 2004/03/12 Remove svn-devscripts from sarge? Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/12 Re: More removal suggestions Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/12 egret bingle emblem yeshiva constitution Dane Clement
• 2004/03/12 d-i second stage packages not in testing Joey Hess
• 2004/03/12 Re: More removal suggestions Colin Watson
• 2004/03/12 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Per Olofsson
• 2004/03/11 Re: More removal suggestions Igor Genibel
• 2004/03/11 More removal suggestions Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/11 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Christian Perrier
• 2004/03/11 Re: Not enough information about sid->testing migration? Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2004/03/11 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Per Olofsson
• 2004/03/11 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Per Olofsson
• 2004/03/11 Re: Not enough information about sid->testing migration? Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/11 Re: Not enough information about sid->testing migration? Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/11 Suggest removal of icecast2 from testing Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/10 Not enough information about sid->testing migration? Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2004/03/10 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Christian Perrier
• 2004/03/10 Message subject Alexis Jernigan
• 2004/03/10 Re: remove mozilla-firebird from testing Eric Dorland
• 2004/03/10 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Joey Hess
• 2004/03/10 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Per Olofsson
• 2004/03/10 Re: Another pcmcia-cs NMU Joey Hess
• 2004/03/10 Re: Bug#236957: new upstream version is available Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2004/03/10 Is apache buggy or not? Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/10 Re: remove mozilla-firebird from testing Andreas Barth
• 2004/03/09 Re: remove mozilla-firebird from testing Colin Watson
• 2004/03/09 Re: remove mozilla-firebird from testing Andre Lehovich
• 2004/03/09 Re: remove mozilla-firebird from testing Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/09 remove mozilla-firebird from testing Andre Lehovich
• 2004/03/09 Tylenol not strong enough? Tracy Malone
• 2004/03/09 Re: Packages in final: for several days Martin Michlmayr
• 2004/03/08 Cycle preventing removal Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/08 Re: Bug#236957: new upstream version is available James Troup
• 2004/03/08 Re: Bug#236957: new upstream version is available Colin Watson
• 2004/03/08 Re: Bug#236957: new upstream version is available Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2004/03/08 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/08 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Richard B. Kreckel
• 2004/03/08 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Kurt Roeckx
• 2004/03/08 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Martin Schulze
• 2004/03/08 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Oliver Elphick
• 2004/03/08 Re: Packages in final: for several days Colin Watson
• 2004/03/08 Re: Packages in final: for several days Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/08 Re: Packages in final: for several days Colin Watson
• 2004/03/08 Re: Packages in final: for several days Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/08 Re: Packages in final: for several days Colin Watson
• 2004/03/08 Re: Packages in final: for several days Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/08 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Martin Schulze
• 2004/03/07 More removal suggestions Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/07 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Josip Rodin
• 2004/03/07 Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Josip Rodin
• 2004/03/07 UNSUBSCRIBE Maxime BrouBrou
• 2004/03/07 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Martin Pitt
• 2004/03/07 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Oliver Elphick
• 2004/03/07 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Matthias Klose
• 2004/03/06 Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/06 Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/06 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/06 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/06 Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Colin Watson
• 2004/03/06 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/06 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Richard B. Kreckel
• 2004/03/06 Re: status of postgresql for sarge? Martin Pitt
• 2004/03/06 status of postgresql for sarge? Matthias Klose
• 2004/03/06 Re: Please remove irssi-plugin-icq from testing Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/05 Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/05 Please remove irssi-plugin-icq from testing Michael Banck
• 2004/03/05 automated response Aide de JouerAvecLeFantasme
• 2004/03/04 Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Simon Huggins
• 2004/03/04 Removal-from-testing proposals, current version Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/03/03 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Josip Rodin
• 2004/03/03 gcc-2.95 for testing Matthias Klose
• 2004/03/03 Re: Packages in final: for several days Colin Watson
• 2004/03/03 Packages in final: for several days Björn Stenberg
• 2004/03/02 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Colin Watson
• 2004/03/02 Re: Why is package X not in testing yet? Richard B. Kreckel
• 2004/03/02 Re: kaffe in testing asap Arnaud Vandyck
• 2004/03/01 [freetelecom.fr #1585828] Réponse Automatique: Re: Your details hotline
• 2004/03/01 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/02/29 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Romain Francoise
• 2004/02/29 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/02/29 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Steve Langasek
• 2004/02/29 Norton AntiVirus hat einen Virus in einer von I hnen gesendeten Nachricht ermittelt. Die infizierte A nlage wurde gelöscht. NAV for Microsoft Exchange-MAIL5
• 2004/02/29 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Romain Francoise
• 2004/02/28 Re: final gcc-3.3_3.3.3-1 for testing Matthias Klose
• 2004/02/27 Re: final gcc-3.3_3.3.3-1 for testing Steve Langasek
• 2004/02/27 Re: final gcc-3.3_3.3.3-1 for testing Domenico Andreoli
• 2004/02/27 final gcc-3.3_3.3.3-1 for testing Matthias Klose
• 2004/02/27 Re: kaffe in testing asap Josip Rodin
• 2004/02/27 Re: kaffe in testing asap Martin Schulze
• 2004/02/27 Re: contrib overrides for testing Arnaud Vandyck
• 2004/02/27 kaffe in testing asap Arnaud Vandyck
• 2004/02/25 RAV Antivirus: risultati di scan RAV AntiVirus
• 2004/02/25 RAV Antivirus: risultati di scan RAV AntiVirus
• 2004/02/25 Re: Remove pgeasy from testing Colin Watson
• 2004/02/25 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/02/25 Remove pgeasy from testing Martin Pitt
• 2004/02/25 Re: contrib overrides for testing Colin Watson
• 2004/02/25 Re: contrib overrides for testing Björn Stenberg
• 2004/02/24 Re: gutenbook both in main and non-US Josip Rodin
• 2004/02/24 Re: gutenbook both in main and non-US Joey Hess
• 2004/02/24 Re: gutenbook both in main and non-US Colin Watson
• 2004/02/24 Re: gutenbook both in main and non-US Andre Lehovich
• 2004/02/24 Re: gutenbook both in main and non-US Colin Watson
• 2004/02/24 Re: gutenbook both in main and non-US Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/02/24 contrib overrides for testing Colin Watson
• 2004/02/23 gutenbook both in main and non-US Andre Lehovich
• 2004/02/23 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Steve Langasek
• 2004/02/23 Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/02/23 Re: Bug#219143: remove packages from testing Andreas Barth
• 2004/02/23 Removal-from-sarge proposals Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/02/22 Re: Bug#219143: remove packages from testing Colin Watson
• 2004/02/22 Re: Bug#219143: remove packages from testing Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/02/22 Re: Qestions to "Why is package X not in testing yet?" Steve Langasek
• 2004/02/22 Re: Qestions to "Why is package X not in testing yet?" Goswin von Brederlow

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]