On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:33:38AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > I think that's about it, really. The buildds are operated by humans, and > > all the signatures are manual although the builds themselves aren't. > > More specifically, buildd will start compiling a package fully > automatically; but it does not handle whatever happened to the build, > successful or otherwise, by itself -- except in a few corner-cases (when > the state on buildd.d.o is "maybe-given-back"). Both successful builds > (have to be signed) and unsuccessful builds (logs have to be interpreted, > appropriate action has to be taken based on the type of failure) need > manual intervention when they're finished. > it looks like a lot of work to be done manually... i suppose it is nearly impossible for a mortal developer to try contributing with this kind of work, isn't it?
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
