IMHO, any time there is a dispute on a technical issue, the Technical Committee is the natural place where the issue should be brought if it can't be resolved between the persons involved, regardless of whether they are DDs, delegates, DPL or whatever, *and* it should have the power to ultimately enforce a decision if it needs to.
If that isn't what the Constitution currently says, or even if it's just unclear whether it actually does, it may be appropriate to amend it. Ian Jackson wrote: > > (1) ask the TC to prominently document their policy of > > non-override of Delegates ... and (2) ask [maybe] > > propose a GR to amend the Constitution to reflect [this] > > I'm not sure this cleanup is a useful use of our time. > There are more fundamental problems. We've just been having a several-dozen-messages-long thread on -vote about a GR proposal that you put forward exactly because the TC can't override delegates. If amending the Constitution would prevent such threads from happening again in the future, I'd say that would be indeed a useful use of our time. Gerardo
