On 05/09/09 at 14:26 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I thought there had been one in the sarge timeframe; but I'm not going to go > > digging any farther to confirm this. Yes, the problem is more or less > > theoretical. > > AFAIK, dak always refused uploads that would create such problems so > maintainers have to find another work around... and it's after the reject > that questions are asked on what would be the proper version number (and > where we don't have a proper answer). > > The rules have been loosened recently for proposed updates however: > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/hertzog/dak.git;a=commitdiff;h=485eac6e5a57d38bfdc7f84aaf982db02405e62e > > An interesting check would be to verify how many packages in lenny or > squeeze have higher version than in unstable currently due to this.
Only debian-installer. Checked using UDD with: select l.source, l.version, u.version from sources l, sources u where l.source = u.source and l.distribution = 'debian' and u.distribution = 'debian' and l.release = 'lenny' and u.release = 'sid' and l.version > u.version; -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
