debian-policy
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Richiesta Contatto
Maria Puccini
developers-reference_11.0.15_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.15_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
developers-reference_11.0.14_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.14_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Bug#228692: Bug#962384: Support for systemd-sysusers
Holger Levsen
developers-reference_11.0.13_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.13_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Bug#878967: marked as done (State intended audience of debian/changelog)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Bug#878967 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#963524: dpkg: source-only *.changes files lack two mandatory fields
Chris Lamb
Bug#963524: dpkg: source-only *.changes files lack two mandatory fields
Felix Lechner
Re: Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Guillem Jover
Processed: Re: Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Russ Allbery
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Sean Whitton
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Guillem Jover
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Russ Allbery
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Sam Hartman
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Guillem Jover
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Russ Allbery
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Guillem Jover
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Russ Allbery
Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads
Edward Little
Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Sean Whitton
Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Felix Lechner
Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Ian Jackson
Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Ian Jackson
Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Sean Whitton
Processed: Re: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Felix Lechner
Processed: unblock 953554 with 953629
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Re: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Felix Lechner
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Sam Hartman
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Jonathan Nieder
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Ian Jackson
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Holger Levsen
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Bill Allombert
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Ian Jackson
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Felix Lechner
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Thorsten Glaser
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Russ Allbery
Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
Thorsten Glaser
developers-reference_11.0.12_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.12_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Ansgar
Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Bill Allombert
Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Ansgar
Re: Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Adam Borowski
Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Bill Allombert
Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Ansgar
Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322 + RFC6532
Russ Allbery
Using /usr/bin/env to invoke maintainer scripts
Felix Lechner
Bug#662998: debian-policy: stripping static libraries
Paul Wise
Bug#962011: developers-reference: dead link to policy in beyond-pkging
Tobias Wiese
Processed: Bug#962011 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#962011: marked as done (developers-reference: dead link to policy in beyond-pkging)
Debian Bug Tracking System
05/28/2020High-low temperature battery manufacturer08:14:54
bella
Purpose of the nobody user
Tom Vajzovic
Re: Purpose of the nobody user
Ansgar
Processed: tagging 961294
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#961294: Allow derivatives to define parent project fields
Simon Quigley
Bug#961294: Allow derivatives to define parent project fields
Russ Allbery
Bug#961294: marked as done (Allow derivatives to define parent project fields)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#960926: developers-reference: updating the packages copyright notices
Holger Levsen
Processed: Bug#960926 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#960926: developers-reference: updating the packages copyright notices
Raphael Hertzog
Bug#960926: developers-reference: updating the packages copyright notices
Holger Levsen
Bug#960926: marked as done (developers-reference: updating the packages copyright notices)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: limit source to debian-policy, tagging 959909
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#959909: debian-policy: complete implementation of ctte decision to forbid vendor-specific series files
Sean Whitton
Bug#959909: debian-policy: complete implementation of ctte decision to forbid vendor-specific series files
gregor herrmann
Bug#959909: debian-policy: complete implementation of ctte decision to forbid vendor-specific series files
Graham Inggs
Bug#959909: marked as done (debian-policy: complete implementation of ctte decision to forbid vendor-specific series files)
Debian Bug Tracking System
debian-policy_4.5.0.2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of debian-policy_4.5.0.2_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Bug#959005: debian-policy: recommends an old version of libjs-sphinxdoc, once again
Gabriele Stilli
Bug#959005: marked as done (debian-policy: recommends an old version of libjs-sphinxdoc, once again)
Debian Bug Tracking System
developers-reference_11.0.11_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.11_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
developers-reference is marked for autoremoval from testing
Debian testing autoremoval watch
developers-reference is marked for autoremoval from testing
Debian testing autoremoval watch
developers-reference is marked for autoremoval from testing
Debian testing autoremoval watch
developers-reference is marked for autoremoval from testing
Debian testing autoremoval watch
Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming
Vincent Prat
Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming
Bill Allombert
Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming
Holger Levsen
Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming
Judit Foglszinger
Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming
Holger Levsen
Processed: Re: Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Bug#956818 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#956818: marked as done (developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packages from Incoming)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Bumping Sphinx 2.4 bugs to RC
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#908155: Bug #908155 in developers-reference marked as pending
Moritz Mühlenhoff
Bug#908155: Bug #908155 in developers-reference marked as pending
Holger Levsen
Processed: Re: Bug #908155 in developers-reference marked as pending
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: unarchiving 908155
Debian Bug Tracking System
debian-policy_4.5.0.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of debian-policy_4.5.0.1_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Processed: limit source to debian-policy, tagging 955036
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955083: debian-policy: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex errors
Lucas Nussbaum
Bug#955083: marked as done (debian-policy: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex errors)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955094: developers-reference: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex errors
Lucas Nussbaum
Processed: Bug#955094 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955094: marked as done (developers-reference: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex errors)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955036: "convenience copies" should be named "embedded code copies"
Christoph Berg
Bug#955036: marked as done ("convenience copies" should be named "embedded code copies")
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Scott Kitterman
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Scott Kitterman
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sam Hartman
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sam Hartman
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Scott Kitterman
Processed: Re: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Guillem Jover
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Guillem Jover
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Scott Kitterman
Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Sean Whitton
Bug#955005: Its fine
Joerg Jaspert
Bug#955005: Seconded.
Scott Kitterman
Bug#955005: Its fine
Joerg Jaspert
Processed: Re: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#955005: marked as done (Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright)
Debian Bug Tracking System
developers-reference_11.0.10_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.10_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Josh Triplett
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Bill Allombert
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sean Whitton
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sam Hartman
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Bill Allombert
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sam Hartman
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Josh Triplett
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
jrnieder
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Josh Triplett
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Jonathan Nieder
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Jonathan Nieder
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Josh Triplett
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sean Whitton
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Guillem Jover
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sean Whitton
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Jonathan Nieder
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Bill Allombert
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sam Hartman
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Guillem Jover
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Guillem Jover
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sam Hartman
Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Sean Whitton
Processed: Re: Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Daniel Shahaf
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Holger Levsen
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Sean Whitton
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Daniel Shahaf
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Sean Whitton
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Daniel Shahaf
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Sean Whitton
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Daniel Shahaf
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Sean Whitton
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Guillem Jover
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Daniel Shahaf
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Russ Allbery
Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax
Guillem Jover
Bug#953911: marked as done (debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog syntax)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: block 953554 with 953629
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Re: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]
Debian Bug Tracking System
VITALY, IL METODO PIÙ INNOVATIVO PER IMPARARE L'ITALIANO
=??Q?NINA_EDIZIONI_+_EDIZIONI_DANT=C9_?=
developers-reference_11.0.9_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
Processing of developers-reference_11.0.9_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Bug#484804: marked as done (developers-reference: please add a suggestion to comment a "wontfix")
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#896013: marked as done (developers-reference: Should include stable-proposed-updates / stable-updates distinction)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Bug#896013 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Anunciese con 100 mil clientes potenciales.
Antonio Amezcua
Processed: Bug#484804 marked as pending in developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Производственные станки
Даниил Тарасов
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Shengjing Zhu
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Olek Wojnar
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Sam Hartman
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Shengjing Zhu
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Shengjing Zhu
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Olek Wojnar
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Shengjing Zhu
Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via another package manager
Bill Allombert
Bug#950440: debian-policy: Confusing conflation of Essential:yes w/ Priority:required
Guillem Jover
Bug#950440: debian-policy: Confusing conflation of Essential:yes w/ Priority:required
Russ Allbery
Bug#950440: debian-policy: Confusing conflation of Essential:yes w/ Priority:required
Chris Hofstaedtler
Bug#950440: debian-policy: Confusing conflation of Essential:yes w/ Priority:required
Santiago Vila
RFC: No new Essential packages?
Josh Triplett
Re: RFC: No new Essential packages?
Ansgar
Re: RFC: No new Essential packages?
Russ Allbery
Re: RFC: No new Essential packages?
Josh Triplett
Re: RFC: No new Essential packages?
Bill Allombert
Re: RFC: No new Essential packages?
Wouter Verhelst
Re: RFC: No new Essential packages?
Bill Allombert
Earlier messages
Later messages