On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:06:40AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I seem to be a minority of one when it comes to thinking that > some latitude could be left to developer in deciding about periods in > short descriptions.
Personally, I don't see putting stuff in policy as removing lattitude. See also http://bugs.debian.org/102213 . > I hereby withdraw the formal objection, though I am still > opposed to adding what I consider to be unnecesary implemetation > details to policy. Good advice on packaging issues is always helpful, and afaict, policy is the best place for it. The developers-reference subject matter is broader Debian issues beyond package contents (eg, mailing lists, how to upload, when to NMU, etc); the packaging-manual used to be detailed low-level documentation on what will be accepted by dpkg, rather than Debian. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
pgpZAoEeAx5rg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
