Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:13:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#139957: fixed in developers-reference 3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2002 06:20:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 26 00:20:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from monk.debian.net (monk.verbum.org) [216.185.54.61] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16pkKE-0003qu-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:20:54 -0600
Received: from space-ghost.verbum.private (freedom.cis.ohio-state.edu
[164.107.60.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "space-ghost.verbum.org", Issuer "monk.verbum.org" (verified
OK))
by monk.verbum.org (Postfix (Debian/GNU)) with ESMTP id 3DB25740009E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 01:20:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: by space-ghost.verbum.private (Postfix (Debian/GNU), from userid 1000)
id D13F68229C8; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 01:10:14 -0500 (EST)
Subject: period at the end of short description?
From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-yDJvq5dARn9Re2bn/Zvj"
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release)
Date: 26 Mar 2002 01:10:14 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=-yDJvq5dARn9Re2bn/Zvj
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi, this is not a major problem, but I'd like to see a bit more
consistency among the package descriptions. The attached patch should
be self-explanatory. A quick analysis of the Packages file suggests
there is already a rough consensus in agreement.
This is obviously a post-woody thing; we should put it off until then.
--=-yDJvq5dARn9Re2bn/Zvj
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=policy.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
cd /tmp/
diff -u -L /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.sgml.gz -L /tmp/policy.sgml.=
new /tmp/jka-com6962AcG /tmp/policy.sgml.new
--- /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.sgml.gz
+++ /tmp/policy.sgml.new
@@ -2397,7 +2397,9 @@
=20
<p>
The single line synopsis should be kept brief - certainly
- under 80 characters.
+ under 80 characters. This should be a sentence fragment
+ which summarizes the key features provided by the package.
+ It should not end in a full stop (`.').
</p>
=20
<p>
Diff finished at Tue Mar 26 01:07:12
--=-yDJvq5dARn9Re2bn/Zvj--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 139957-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2003 14:22:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 26 08:22:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18o2Rk-00083r-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:22:08 -0600
Received: from ajt by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18o2Iw-0005gV-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:13:02 -0500
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.21 $
Subject: Bug#139957: fixed in developers-reference 3.3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:13:02 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
developers-reference, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
developers-reference-fr_3.3_all.deb
to pool/main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference-fr_3.3_all.deb
developers-reference-ja_3.3_all.deb
to pool/main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference-ja_3.3_all.deb
developers-reference_3.3.dsc
to pool/main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference_3.3.dsc
developers-reference_3.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference_3.3.tar.gz
developers-reference_3.3_all.deb
to pool/main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference_3.3_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated developers-reference
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:29:07 -0500
Source: developers-reference
Binary: developers-reference-ja developers-reference-fr developers-reference
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
developers-reference - Debian Developer's Reference
developers-reference-fr - Debian Developer's Reference, French version
developers-reference-ja - Debian Developer's Reference, Japanese version
Closes: 108416 139957 166388 172897 174161 177448
Changes:
developers-reference (3.3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Frédéric Bothamy:
- French translation updated to version 3.2.2 (more or less)
- proofread by Philippe Batailler
* Raphaël Hertzog:
- added "ddtp" keyword in the PTS documentation
* Josip Rodin:
- split out the doc-files per language, closes: #177448
- shuffled stuff around in the packages chapter
- added a section describing how to handle large amounts of
architecture-independent data bundled with programs
- added best practices on debian/changelog files, based on a patch
kindly provided by Daniel Kobras, closes: #166388
- described debdiff and dpkg-depcheck, and linked to them from the
right places in the document, closes: #172897
- describe the current practice in writing synopsis lines,
closes: #174161
* Adam Di Carlo:
- update (c) year
- convert to debhelper (compat mode 4); maintainer scripts no longer
needed
- split -ja and -fr versions out into separate packages
- top-level makefile deletes targets on error; clean is cleaner
- replace the manual debian/control processing to show the document's
table of contents (TOC) with a new script 'debian/tocsubstvars';
note that the TOC displayed in the developers-reference-{fr,ja}
package descriptions are in English until UTF8 control files are
allowed; proper escaping of single quotes here requires newest
debhelper
- editorial changes on material added in this version
- reorder "Best Packaging Practices" a bit
- rework "Best practices for debian/control" based on contributions
from Colin Walters, Branden Robinson, Sebastian Rittau and others;
closes: #139957, #108416
- primary author is [EMAIL PROTECTED]; remove
emails from other authors to prevent spam and confusion
Files:
cff70d8607f21109bc7f7cb749b92264 827 doc optional developers-reference_3.3.dsc
5a01a59c90bf47affac67fcab21e48dc 211080 doc optional
developers-reference_3.3.tar.gz
1105887c39bd02595e6e3b8ac3c00340 461126 doc optional
developers-reference_3.3_all.deb
73ba0e1c19d16200a7514063c814cb7e 480890 doc optional
developers-reference-fr_3.3_all.deb
61ae8ac0c88fba9e760a79bd60c01464 89814 doc optional
developers-reference-ja_3.3_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBPlpuo4/8QF79WmfNAQGBJwP/WwpX7O9bEJoagBecJSBDsqGYsjm+zaVU
ye08vkSmZ/YaAyo/IZQUCkKJq+i+569e2FrGcmdx+gc+g34vk/gX22obXw3dGT2p
GF2JCzRB6x0hObKdStwLCsYsAr37SC5vsMbhBMFtTyeHA3bv6aCI8CrnYdIVYVaI
iN/NmpyjrsU=
=t47v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
