Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Joey Hess wrote: > > Amendments > > > > Changes in handling library dependencies (#55730) > > * Under discussion. > > I don't think the proposal itself is under discussion, everyone seems > to agree it is a good idea. The only discussion is about related > technicalities.
Your right, but until we're sure those technicalities are addressed, I for one don't want to shove it in. (Personally, I think those technicalities are addressed.) -- see shy jo
