Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> Previously Joey Hess wrote:
> > Amendments
> > Changes in handling library dependencies (#55730)
> > * Under discussion.
> I don't think the proposal itself is under discussion, everyone seems
> to agree it is a good idea. The only discussion is about related
> technicalities.
Moreover, this is a technical change, and I think those follow
somewhat different rules, no? And IIRC, it's not really a policy
change; the bug was filed against the packaging manual, no? Should it
even be on this list?
p.s. I also agree that it's a good idea, maybe even a great one. :-)
--
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
