debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2001/04/23 Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper Lars Steinke
• 2001/04/22 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/22 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Bob Hilliard
• 2001/04/22 Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against? Chris Waters
• 2001/04/22 Re: Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS Bob Hilliard
• 2001/04/22 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Herbert Xu
• 2001/04/22 Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against? Taral
• 2001/04/22 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Richard Braakman
• 2001/04/21 Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against? Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/21 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/21 Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against? Itai Zukerman
• 2001/04/21 Definition of Binary field in control file Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/04/21 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/21 Re: Policy for stripping binaries Richard Braakman
• 2001/04/21 Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against? Ben Collins
• 2001/04/21 Policy for stripping binaries Bob Hilliard
• 2001/04/21 Re: Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS Colin Watson
• 2001/04/21 compressed binaries in packages, for or against? Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/21 Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS Bob Hilliard
• 2001/04/21 Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Colin Watson
• 2001/04/21 Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Chris Waters
• 2001/04/21 Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Colin Watson
• 2001/04/21 Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Chris Waters
• 2001/04/21 Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Colin Watson
• 2001/04/20 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/19 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/19 CVS log messages Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/19 CVS jdg: Finished up chapter 5 changes debian-policy
• 2001/04/18 Bug#91276: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 2001/03/26] update policy to match new serious severity) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#93047: marked as done ([TYPO] policy: "GNU Public Licence" --> "GNU GPL") Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#88788: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#88651: marked as done (debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#87828: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 14/03/2001] Deprecate confusing Build-Depends arch syntax) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#87711: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 29/03/2001] Clarification of example configuration files) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#87007: marked as done ([TYPO] policy: ch sect 2.2 "to to" --> "to do") Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#93705: marked as done (packaging-manual not available in sid) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#93620: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Bug#86507: marked as done (recommends removed package) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 CVS jdg: * Improvements to sections 5.1 and 5.2. debian-policy
• 2001/04/18 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/18 Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.3.0 Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/18 Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.3.0 Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/18 debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED Debian Installer
• 2001/04/18 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/18 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/04/17 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/17 Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages (fwd) Colin Watson
• 2001/04/17 Re: Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages Colin Watson
• 2001/04/17 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Richard Braakman
• 2001/04/17 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/17 Processed: Bug#80343: general -> debian-policy Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/17 Bug#80343: general -> debian-policy Colin Watson
• 2001/04/17 Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/17 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/16 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/16 Re: Bug#94114: mesag3-glide2: mesag3-glide2 needs MESA_GLX_FX Herbert Xu
• 2001/04/16 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Seth Arnold
• 2001/04/16 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/16 Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy Brendan O'Dea
• 2001/04/16 Re: Bug#94114: mesag3-glide2: mesag3-glide2 needs MESA_GLX_FX Marcelo E. Magallon
• 2001/04/16 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/16 Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Richard Braakman
• 2001/04/16 Re: Policy reformatting Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/16 Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Steve Greenland
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/15 Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Seth Arnold
• 2001/04/15 CVS jdg: Chapter 4 done debian-policy
• 2001/04/15 Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Josip Rodin
• 2001/04/15 CVS jdg: Improvements to chapter 3 debian-policy
• 2001/04/15 Bug#90989: Processed: drop #90989 Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/15 Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/15 CVS srivasta: Fix breakage in the rules file debian-policy
• 2001/04/15 CVS srivasta: Removed illegasl tag <ital>; changed it to <em> debian-policy
• 2001/04/15 CVS srivasta: * Removed recommendation on packaging-manual debian-policy
• 2001/04/15 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/15 Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Josip Rodin
• 2001/04/15 Processed: drop #90989 Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/14 Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/14 Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/14 Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory. Daniel Kobras
• 2001/04/14 Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/14 Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory. Branden Robinson
• 2001/04/14 Re: Must and should again Sam Hartman
• 2001/04/14 Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory. Daniel Kobras
• 2001/04/14 Processed: Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/14 Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages Santiago Vila
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/13 Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Sam Hartman
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/13 Re: Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Re: .text or .txt Alexander Hvostov
• 2001/04/12 Re: .text or .txt Seth Arnold
• 2001/04/12 Re: .text or .txt Alexander Hvostov
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Seth Arnold
• 2001/04/12 CVS jdg: * Typos in various documents debian-policy
• 2001/04/12 Processed: [sarnold@willamette.edu: Re: Help wanted] Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/12 Bug#89038: the informatoion in the manpage should be in policy Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Bug#89039: Not policy's job? Frank Belew
• 2001/04/12 Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last Yann Dirson
• 2001/04/12 Re: .text or .txt Branden Robinson
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Steve Greenland
• 2001/04/12 Bug#89039: Not policy's job? Seth Arnold
• 2001/04/12 Bug#87994: PROPOSAL] better initscript definition, and adding 'restart-if-running' Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 CVS jdg: Finished chapter 2 debian-policy
• 2001/04/12 .text or .txt Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Help wanted Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Peter Palfrader
• 2001/04/12 Re: Must and should again Richard Braakman
• 2001/04/12 Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/12 Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/11 Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid Javier Kohen
• 2001/04/11 Unidentified subject! skdjfh
• 2001/04/11 Re: Must and should again Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/11 Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/11 Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/11 Re: New versions of the FHS Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/11 RE: Must and should again Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/11 CVS jdg: * Get the version.ent non-compression thingy right this time! debian-policy
• 2001/04/11 Must and should again Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/11 Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/04/11 Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/04/11 RE: New versions of the FHS Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/04/11 Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/11 New versions of the FHS Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/10 Processed: Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/10 Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/10 Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Jaldhar H. Vyas
• 2001/04/08 Processed: another accepted X policy proposal Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/08 Bug#93295: example contradicting rationale in chapter 11 (Diversions) Arthur Korn
• 2001/04/06 Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Brian Russo
• 2001/04/06 Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Adam Conrad
• 2001/04/06 Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Martin Michlmayr
• 2001/04/06 Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/04/06 Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Brian Russo
• 2001/04/06 Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Brian Russo
• 2001/04/06 Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Brian Russo
• 2001/04/06 Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Brian Russo
• 2001/04/06 Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Yann Dirson
• 2001/04/05 Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/05 Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Yann Dirson
• 2001/04/05 Processed: 3 accepted X policy proposals Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/05 Unidentified subject! Denis Kosygin
• 2001/04/04 Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts Henrique M Holschuh
• 2001/04/04 Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/04 Bug#92589: marked as done (there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/04 Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/03 Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Adam Conrad
• 2001/04/03 Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Joey Hess
• 2001/04/03 Processed: closing (bah) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/03 Processed: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/03 Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Henrique M Holschuh
• 2001/04/03 Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/03 Re: Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Jean-Philippe Guérard
• 2001/04/03 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/03 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Branden Robinson
• 2001/04/03 Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/03 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/03 Bug#92744: Section 10.1.2., better example Tommi Komulainen
• 2001/04/03 Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Anthony Towns
• 2001/04/03 Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Josip Rodin
• 2001/04/03 Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Herbert Xu
• 2001/04/03 Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/04/02 Processed: reassign Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/02 Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Jean-Philippe Guérard
• 2001/04/02 Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Chris Lawrence
• 2001/04/02 Processed: accepted proposal Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/02 Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Branden Robinson
• 2001/04/02 Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Henrique M Holschuh
• 2001/04/02 Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Jean-Philippe Guérard
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/02 Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/04/02 Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Josip Rodin
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Seth Arnold
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/02 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/04/01 Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/04/01 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/04/01 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Ben Collins
• 2001/04/01 Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/01 Re: Definition of alphanumeric? Julian Gilbey
• 2001/04/01 Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Peter Palfrader

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]