On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 04:38:34PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > non-US is not a good name for the non-US (ahem) part of the archive. It's not > only non-US, it's also (for example) non-France. And when/if the US stops with > the silly crypto export laws, the name will be even more obviously fake. >
It could be named after the country where the master archive was stored, allowing multiple crypto/patent software sites. It would be best to have several of these (debian-uk, debian-jp, debian-de, debian-au, debian-br, ...) so that any package would have at least one potential home. Packages could be uploaded to as many sites as the law (or maintainer's time) allows. Mirrors of these archives could only be made to countries with the same or more liberal crypto/patent/speech policies, but the network load would be more distributed than the current setup, and people should use squid proxies anyway. Some of these archives might be willing to host data section packages as well, as they wouldn't be as heavily used or mirrored.
