On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 09:13:48PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > I thought about naming it 'crypto', but it would also not describe it > > correctly > > (since we also have packages encumbered by other silly laws there, like > > software patents). Any ideas?
Do we really have other packages in there for other reasons than the cryptography laws? I couldn't find any. I think calling it "crypto" makes a lot of sense. It's a clear label, and people will know how to treat those packages in their country. We'll have to find another place for packages that are patent-encumbered in weird ways, if any show up. "non-free" will fit the bill in most cases, I think. Richard Braakman
