Hi,
>>"Guy" == Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Guy> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> How about this: If four or more developers call for a hold on
>> the proposal, and move to send the proposal to the larger developer
>> body as a SRP, then, at the proposers discretion, the proposal shall
>> be sent to the general developers body as a SRP.
Guy> The constitution already allows for how developers can override the
Guy> tech committee and vice-versa.
Umm, how does the tech committee figure in this? I meant to
say that say, some one proposes an amendment. After discussion,
people are strongly divided, and it shall take 4 people to send this
to the general developer body. Where does the Tech committee come in?
Puzzled,
manoj
--
This is a serious lapse of taste and judgment but does not imply that
they are stupid, lazy, or incompetent. Indeed, their intelligence,
diligence, and competence in service to the x86 are all too
depressingly obvious. Henry Spencer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
