Hi,
>>"Adam" == Adam P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> I find two problems with Manoj's proposal.
Adam> Unlike before, when the policy editor gathered in issues
Adam> which, in his view, were candidates for inclusion in
Adam> policy, I propose that issues are brought up in the policy
Adam> group, and, if the initial discussion warrants it, any
Adam> developer, with at least two(?) seconds can formally
Adam> propose as a policy amendment.
Adam> You mention "any developer" or "developers" here, but I think
Adam> you should say "registered Debian developer". That is to say,
Adam> you must be a registered Debian developer to sponsor an issue
Adam> (you could sponsor an issue raised by a non-developer,
Adam> however), and the seconds must also be Debian developers.
In the debian context, when one says developer, on means a
debian developer. However, if there is confusion, I shall add
``registered debian''. I agree that Debian Policy should be created
by Debian develoers.
I await other input on whether one should use the BTS.
manoj
--
"Freedom" has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, be
they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. Kelvin Throop III
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
