On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 01:56:24PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > > > W: libaspell0: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libaspell.so.0.0.0 > > > usr/lib/libaspell.so > > > usr/lib/libaspell.so.0.0.0 > > > usr/lib/libaspell.so -> libaspell.so.0.0.0 > > > > Simply, make this libaspell.so go into the libaspell-dev package. > > How to do it "the right way" I don't know, but simple rming and lning > > would do the trick. > > But I want to build a total of four packages - aspell (containing the > binaries), libaspell0 (containing the libraries), libaspell-dev (containing > the header files) and aspell-doc (containg the documentation).
I didn't say anything about that, it is just that the libfoo.so symlink always goes in the -dev package. The rest is fine, except that you should include static libraries in libaspell-dev, too (don't ask me why, though :). > > > And (sorry to ask a really stupid Q) why is it > > > libaspell.so.0.0.0 and not libaspell.so.0.26.2 ? > > Was it .0.26.2 before? > > No. I was just wondering whether it should be .so.0.26.2 . It could, but the soname doesn't have to be equal to the program/library version. A little confusing to me, but many libs make it different. -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
