On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 07:05:55PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > Also, here is how I see the dependancies between the various pcakages - > > > > Package Dependencies > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > aspell suggests aspell-doc > > aspell-doc depends aspell > > IMO depends is too strong. If the documentation is essential to use the > program, it should be in the aspell package. The doc package should be > for "extra" (more complete, different format etc.) documentation. Make it > suggests instead. Although it's unlikely someone may want to read the > documentation without installing the package.
I agree, don't make it Depends:, just Suggests: or Reccomends:. > > aspell-dev suggests aspell-doc and aspell This one should depend on aspell - why linking to aspell, when you don't have runtime? Suggests: aspell-doc is fine. And please, do what Joey said, make libaspell0 and libaspell-dev, so people can know instantly it is a library. -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
