Edward Betts wrote: > On Wed, 03 Feb, 1999, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > > Thanks for all the help guys. I am now packaging aspell into aspell.deb, > > aspell-dev.deb and aspell-doc.deb Should all of them go into the same > libaspell0 for the libraries? aspell-bin for binaries? and libaspell-dev?
aspell for binaries, libaspell0 for libraries, libaspell-dev for headers and aspell-doc for documentation. > i disagree > > pacakge dependencies > aspell-bin suggests aspell-doc, depends libaspell0 > aspell-doc suggests aspell-bin > libaspell0 suggests aspell-bin, aspell-doc > libaspell-dev suggests aspell, depends libaspell0 Have decided to go with your suggestion. I have not yet uploaded my packages. My packages are available from http://www.aunet.org/thaths/hacks/deb/aspell/ Would appreciate if you folks took a look and told me if things are OK for an upload. Thaths -- Homer: Now, what do we say when we get to the ticket booth? Bart and Lisa: We're under six. Homer: And I'm a college student! Sudhakar C13n http://people.netscape.com/thaths/ Indentured Slave