On Wed, 03 Feb, 1999, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Thanks for all the help guys. I am now packaging aspell into aspell.deb,
> aspell-dev.deb and aspell-doc.deb Should all of them go into the same
libaspell0 for the libraries? aspell-bin for binaries? and libaspell-dev?
> section (text)? Or should each of them go into seperate sections (aspell =
> text, aspell-dev = devel, aspell-doc = doc)? Different packages seem to do
libaspell0 = libs?
> different things about this. enlightenment-doc, for example, is in section
> x11. postgresql-doc is in section doc while postgresql is in section misc.
>
i prefer the postresql method
> Also, here is how I see the dependancies between the various pcakages -
>
> Package Dependencies
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> aspell suggests aspell-doc
> aspell-doc depends aspell
> aspell-dev suggests aspell-doc and aspell
>
i disagree
pacakge dependencies
aspell-bin suggests aspell-doc, depends libaspell0
aspell-doc suggests aspell-bin
libaspell0 suggests aspell-bin, aspell-doc
libaspell-dev suggests aspell, depends libaspell0
--
GNU does not eliminate all the world's problems, only some of them.
-- The GNU Manifesto
