Hi Johannes,
many thanks for getting involved.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:11:23PM +0100, Johannes Röhr wrote:
> Tony asked me to join discussion on Flexbar packaging. I'm not sure if the
> stable SeqAn 1.3.1 package release misses functionality that I rely on, or if
> the behaviour of functions changed even if it compiles with this release. For
> example the new ArgumentParser has been added rather recently and I would not
> be surprised if its functionality changed in the time between the SeqAn
> package release and the revision that I incorporated.
>
> However, I think the question is not only if it compiles somehow using this
> package. It should be exacly the same behaviour for one version of Flexbar.
> This isn't clear if the seqan sources differ in version, not to talk about
> slight modifications I made.
Thanks for the clarifications. I'd take this for some veto to not use
the Debian packaged seqan library. The question is whether the
modifications you made might be incorporated into upstream seqan. If
this would be feasible we could package a seqan version that would fit
flexbar (and most probably other applications.) Do you think this is
possible?
> Thank you for the interest to include Flexbar!
Sure. We try to fit the needs of all bioinformatics tasks.
Kind regards and thanks again for joining here
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130125220803.gb12...@an3as.eu
