On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:15:31PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Freitag, 13. Juni 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Please review the attached draft, share your comments and let me know if I > > missed your company. > > I don't like the focus / expressed view that LTS is made possible by > sponsoring organisations rather than volunteers. I think it sets a bad > precedence.
* There have been five updates so far: https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2014/06/threads.html 3/5 have been released by existing security team members and we've always stated that we help to get this started, but it needs to be self-hosting service * Noone has taken care of the linux-2.6 update, although all the patches have been prepared and Carlos has made various tests * Noone is taking care of updating lts-needed.txt or other triage So, from my view it's fairly obvious that Debian LTS will only be sustainable if there's an ongoing base of sponsored work. > Not only does the existing text emphasize this company support it also > completly lacks mentioning volunteers and thanking them for their work. That is true, that should be added. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140613133959.GA3970@pisco.westfalen.local
