On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:46:08AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > Because: > > > - it would become unmanageable and hard to read > > > - listing companies is a way to make them accountable of their promise > > > (i.e. "thank you for the promise, now is the time to deliver!") > > > - companies are usually much more interested in public visibility in PR > > > than > > > individuals developers > > > - listing volunteers that promised to help but did not do anything yet > > > seems > > > wrong to me > > > > In that vain, it doesn't make to list companies that haven't > > contributed anything yet either. > > I think I have answered this just above. It's a way to make them > accountable of their promise by delivering what we can deliver in > exchange, i.e. a bit of publicity.
Wouldn't it have the same effect on individuals who have pledged to contribute? - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140615101057.gg31...@hezmatt.org
